Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 43.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1428 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1426 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1442 |
Multimodal Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | 1247 |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1408 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | 1428 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1406 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1420 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1428 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 43.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.