Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5

Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 28.6 to 24.1.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
ProviderByteDance SeedXiaomi
Noometry Index43.243.4
Released2026-02-142026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.28
Results tracked2023

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding14721469
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
ALE-Bench—513.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14531450
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
CritPt—3.7%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math14391436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert14401460

Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision12741247

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English14411404
LMArena Chinese14891468
LMArena French14711447
LMArena German14421421
LMArena Japanese14081306
LMArena Korean14111363
LMArena Russian14491395
LMArena Spanish14601416

Instruction Following Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following14141434

Long Context Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query14281445

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text14481428
LMArena Creative Writing14061393
LMArena Multi-Turn14411445

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5?

Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 43.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper