Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Seed 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 24.1.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderByteDance SeedMoonshot AI
Noometry Index43.243.3
Released2026-02-142026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.95
Output $ / M tokens$3$4
Results tracked2019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1472—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1453—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1439—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1440—

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1441—
LMArena Chinese1489—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1442—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Russian1449—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Seed 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 42.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper