Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 39.3.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 43.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2026-04-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.0675 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $0.23 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1447 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1359 |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 927.17 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1439 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 74.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.85 |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1470 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 82.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 73.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
Multimodal Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1260 |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1421 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1460 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1417 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1420 |
Long Context Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1428 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1434 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1441 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1305 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.