Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

46.7

Rank #55 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

40.8

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 35.8.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderXiaomiXiaomi
Noometry Index46.740.8
Released2026-09-222025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.28
Results tracked1421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena WebDev16181330
LMArena Coding15381443
SciCode—25.9%
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts15111420
CritPt—0%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math14971396

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert15481425

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1265—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English14741391
LMArena Chinese15321463
LMArena Russian14811387
LMArena French—1429
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1324
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14901392

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query15001409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text14911411
LMArena Creative Writing14651375
LMArena Multi-Turn14631404

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper