Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 35.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 57.4% for Grok 4.7 and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 500K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 57.4% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1443 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 17.7% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1420 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1396 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1425 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1463 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.
Is Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.