Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 22.1.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderXiaomiXiaomi
Noometry Index50.343.0
Released2026-09-212026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.87
Results tracked1923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena WebDev16291433
LMArena Coding15341476
ALE-Bench1,158785.17
SciCode60.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts15121457
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
CritPt26.6%—
Thematic Generalization—45.9%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math14941447
ProofBench70%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert15431478

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English14741416
LMArena Chinese15291456
LMArena Russian14801427
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14931445

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query15011455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text14921436
LMArena Creative Writing14681415
LMArena Multi-Turn14641456

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper