Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 37.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1497 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.