Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen Max
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 35.6 to 21.0.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 34.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 33K |
| Max output | 66K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155), Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1270 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141), Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109), Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1329 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1324 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1290 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115), Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1262 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101), Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen Max?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen Max?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen Max better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.