Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiniMax-M2.5

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 17.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index43.638.3
Released2026-03-182026-02-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$1.20
Results tracked1833

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Coding14661381
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
LMArena WebDev—1387
SWE-bench Multilingual—68.3%
ALE-Bench—618.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
Terminal-Bench—42.7%
Vending-Bench 2—-23.16

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14451372
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—16.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.68

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Math14301378
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Expert14491379
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), MiniMax-M2.5: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Non-English14041338
LMArena Chinese14651393
LMArena French14471362
LMArena German13991362
LMArena Japanese13171171
LMArena Korean13551232
LMArena Russian14121358
LMArena Spanish14341354

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Instruction Following14281353

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Longer Query14421366
CL-bench—11.4%
CL-bench Life—6.3%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Text14231359
LMArena Creative Writing13921331
LMArena Multi-Turn14451364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than MiniMax-M2.5?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M2.5?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 43.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper