Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen Plus
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 36.7 to 22.0.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1303 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1325 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen Plus?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen Plus?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen Plus better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen Plus share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.