Model comparison
MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2 leads 39.1 to 35.8.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2025-10-27 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1350 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1336 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1367 | — |
| LMArena French | 1336 | — |
| LMArena German | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1332 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1362 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is MiniMax-M2 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.