Model comparison
MiniMax-M2 vs o1-mini
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 9 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiniMax-M2 leads 18.6 to 8.9.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2025-10-27 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1362 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102), o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Too close to call
MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1350 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1336 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1314 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1367 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1336 | 1292 |
| LMArena German | 1366 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | 1302 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context Too close to call
MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1332 | 1321 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1362 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2 better than o1-mini?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2 or o1-mini better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and o1-mini share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.