Model comparison
Granite 4.1 8b vs o1-mini
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 4 categories and o1-mini in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 24.6 to 8.9.
- Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.8 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1-mini leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1313 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1190 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: —, o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1294 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1311 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1310 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multilingual o1-mini leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1335 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1238 | 1283 |
| LMArena French | — | 1292 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1302 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1268 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context o1-mini leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1321 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 8b better than o1-mini?
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.1 8b or o1-mini better for coding?
o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and o1-mini share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.