Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs o1-mini
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 3 categories and o1-mini in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 19.2 to 8.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math o1-mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge o1-mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1292 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1302 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context o1-mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1321 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than o1-mini?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or o1-mini better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and o1-mini share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.