Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 33K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.