Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

33.9

Rank #228 Reported

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

36.7

Rank #203 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Devstral Small 2505 scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.7% for Devstral Small 2505 and 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.30 for Devstral Small 2505.
  • Devstral Small 2505 accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and Gemma 3n E4b IT specifications
Devstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Noometry Index33.936.7
Released2025-05-072025-05-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K33K
Max output128K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.12
Results tracked418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Devstral Small 2505 leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.6 (#160), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
SciCode28.8%—
LMArena Coding—1269

Reasoning Too close to call

Devstral Small 2505: 19.1 (#243), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%31.5%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1284

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Math—1251

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Expert—1245

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Non-English—1285
LMArena Chinese—1310
LMArena French—1330
LMArena German—1312
LMArena Japanese—1274
LMArena Korean—1259
LMArena Russian—1288
LMArena Spanish—1305

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Instruction Following—1255

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Longer Query—1277

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Text—1306
LMArena Creative Writing—1287
LMArena Multi-Turn—1276

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Devstral Small 2505 lists at $0.10 and $0.30.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Devstral Small 2505 does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper