Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen Turbo
Mistral Nemo and Qwen Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (26.4 vs 27.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Turbo in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Nemo leads 25.5 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 10.8% for Mistral Nemo and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Mistral Nemo.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Mistral Nemo leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | 56.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 41.8% |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen Turbo?
Mistral Nemo and Qwen Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (26.4 vs 27.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo lists at $0.15 and $0.15.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen Turbo share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.