Model comparison
Qwen Turbo vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen Turbo and Qwen3-1.7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.1 vs 26.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Turbo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-1.7B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2024-11-01 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
Math Too close to call
Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.1% | 8.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads
Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.8% | 38% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Turbo better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen Turbo and Qwen3-1.7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.1 vs 26.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Turbo and Qwen3-1.7B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Turbo has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.