Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 vs QwQ Plus
Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 53.1 to 36.4.
- QwQ Plus is cheaper at $0.80 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 38.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2025-03-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.25 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| SciCode | 58.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 31.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | — |
| CritPt | 15.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | — |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.21 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 39% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1483 | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), QwQ Plus: 36.4
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | — |
| LMArena French | 1494 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1437 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1485 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than QwQ Plus?
Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or QwQ Plus?
QwQ Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and QwQ Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and QwQ Plus has 1.