Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs StarCoder 2 15B

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 15B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 51.3 to 36.6.
  • StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
Muse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index49.938.1
Released2026-04-082024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—
LMArena Coding1498—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.4%
HumanEval+—37.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21105
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
ProofBench39%—
LMArena Math1483—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1478—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%
MMLU—64.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1472—
LMArena Chinese1518—
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1451—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1483—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1457—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1437—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LMArena Multi-Turn1485—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than StarCoder 2 15B?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and StarCoder 2 15B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper