Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.4

Rank #27 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

32.8

Rank #241 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 3 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 52.9 to 21.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GDP.pdf: 27.6% for Muse Spark 1.3 and 2% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderMetaAmazon
Noometry Index54.432.8
Released2026-09-022025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode59.7%42.7%
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1655—
LMArena Coding1516—

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GDP.pdf27.6%2%
APEX-Agents57.8%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt24.9%0%
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.89—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
LMArena Math1497—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1310—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1527—
LMArena French1534—
LMArena Korean1513—
LMArena Russian1491—
LMArena Spanish1485—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1481—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1491—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1450—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1486—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.1 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper