Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 3 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.3 leads 46.1 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 19.1% for GLM-5.3 and 0% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
GLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Amazon
Noometry Index54.833.4
Released2026-08-142025-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode59%42.7%
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
WeirdML75.4%—
LMArena Coding1496—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
APEX-Agents56.6%—
GDP.pdf—2%
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt19.1%0%
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1489—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—
LMArena Math1489—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
LMArena Expert1516—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1457—
LMArena Chinese1528—
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1499—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1472—
LMArena Russian1463—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1482—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1471—
LMArena Creative Writing1457—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—
LMArena Multi-Turn1472—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper