Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Olmo 3 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.7

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 36.5.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index54.838.7
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3714

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding15141319
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts15031302
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14941316
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert15161273

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14811255
LMArena Chinese15291300
LMArena French15241291
LMArena German15151290
LMArena Russian14901254
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14771275

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14881296

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14901300
LMArena Creative Writing14551256
LMArena Multi-Turn14821290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper