Model comparison

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 33.8.
  • Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.

Side by side

Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Nova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.356.8
Released2025-04-302026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output10K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$2
Output $ / M tokens$12.50$6
Results tracked639

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
Omni-MATH35%—
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
MMLU-Pro72.6%—
GPQA (HELM)51.8%—
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
IFEval80.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper