Model comparison
o1-mini vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 27.3 to 8.9.
Side by side
| o1-mini | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2024-09-12 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 35.1 (#218), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1362 | 1439 |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| WeirdML | 36.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 78.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1-mini: 24.3 (#112), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 8.9 (#340), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1398 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 18.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 14% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 72.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.82 | — |
| LiveBench | 57.8% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 33.7 (#168), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1358 | 1418 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 46.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 62% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 89.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 34.8 (#180), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | 62.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.6% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 43.8 (#177), Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1289 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1292 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1278 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1245 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1223 | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1302 | 1408 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 67.0 (#200), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1304 | 1376 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 65.4% | — |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 40.1 (#156), Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
o1-mini: 48.6 (#196), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1317 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1391 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 64.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 40.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-mini better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is o1-mini or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.