Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.7 to 38.1.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1398 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1418 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 1421 |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245), Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1150 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | 1408 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1376 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237), Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1391 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.