Model comparison
o3-pro vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 29.5.
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper at $1.30 / $7.80 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 262K |
| Max output | 100K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | $1.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | $7.80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 86.9% | 87.2% |
| LMCA | 38.5% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | 149.24 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
Math Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1465 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multilingual Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1438 |
Long Context o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1457 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1435 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1.30 per million input tokens and $7.80 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.
Is o3-pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 48.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.