Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 27.3.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index32.229.1
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding12101040
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12081028

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math12081089
Omni-MATH16.1%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
MMLU-Pro41.4%—
GPQA (HELM)28.7%—
LMArena Expert—984

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English11601000
LMArena Chinese11921016
LMArena Russian11871004
LMArena French—1038
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1058

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11861023
IFEval78%—

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1194996

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12181050
LMArena Creative Writing11991024
LMArena Multi-Turn1221989
WildBench73.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper