Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.1

Rank #249 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where gpt-oss-20b leads 42.4 to 25.4.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
gpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index32.129.1
Released2025-08-052024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.1 (#185), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13071040
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.2 (#146), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 18.8 (#251), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12741028
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.81—

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#93), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math13171089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#186), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1258984
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 42.4 (#192), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12691000
LMArena Chinese13111016
LMArena German12491006
LMArena Japanese1245899
LMArena Korean1239856
LMArena Russian12791004
LMArena Spanish12671058
LMArena French—1038

Instruction Following gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 62.0 (#235), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12361023
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#203), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1251996

Writing & Preference gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.8 (#260), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12881050
LMArena Creative Writing12011024
LMArena Multi-Turn1268989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper