Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Pixtral Large
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Pixtral Large score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 32.9.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Pixtral Large?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Pixtral Large score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.