Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 35.0.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1316 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.