Model comparison
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 42.1.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-27 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.19 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.13 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 326.4 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.26 | 144.64 |
| SimpleBench | 35.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| DTBench | 77.1% | — |
| LMCA | 31% | — |
Math Too close to call
Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 22.5% | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.4% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 10.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.