Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Palm 2 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Palm 2 leads 30.8 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 994 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Palm 2 leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Palm 2 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Palm 2 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.