Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 31.2 to 16.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 7B or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.