Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Palm 2
Gemma 7B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 7B leads 25.1 to 20.9.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 994 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1005 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1049 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1010 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Palm 2?
Gemma 7B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 7B or Palm 2 better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.