Model comparison

Palm 2 vs Qwen2-72B

Palm 2 and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2-72B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 40.8 to 25.6.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Palm 2 and Qwen2-72B specifications
Palm 2Qwen2-72B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.030.0
Released—2024-06-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1026

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Coding9941196
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts10051191
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28

Math Too close to call

Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Math10491235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
LMArena Expert—1171
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Qwen2-72B leads

Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English9161176
LMArena Chinese8871240
LMArena French—1170
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Russian—1169
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Qwen2-72B leads

Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following10101181

Long Context Qwen2-72B leads

Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query10101192

Writing & Preference Qwen2-72B leads

Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Text10271203
LMArena Creative Writing9911181
LMArena Multi-Turn9941196

Frequently asked questions

Is Palm 2 better than Qwen2-72B?

Palm 2 and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Palm 2 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.0 vs 29.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen2-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper