Model comparison
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 57.6 to 53.5.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.0 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | 1035 |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | 1018 |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1173 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | — |
Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1110 | — |
| LMArena German | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | — |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1113 | 1048 |
Long Context Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1107 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.