Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 41.6 to 29.6.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.333.4
Released—2024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—29K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1531

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.8 (#279), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Coding10931276
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Too close to call

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 20.8 (#231), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts10871251
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.49
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Too close to call

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 33.0 (#208), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Math11521251
LiveBench Math—46.6%
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 28.6 (#244), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert10511221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multilingual Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 25.9 (#282), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English10131205
LMArena Chinese10331222
LMArena Russian10191228
LMArena German1031—
LMArena Japanese954—
LMArena Korean880—

Instruction Following Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 54.1 (#282), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Instruction Following10581223
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%

Long Context Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.7 (#277), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query10421251

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 29.6 (#294), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text10801230
LMArena Creative Writing10451174
LMArena Multi-Turn10491222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.8 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper