Model comparison
Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 31.2 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.075 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.