Model comparison

Phi-4 vs Yi-1.5-34B

Phi-4 and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 leads 32.6 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 64.9% for Phi-4 and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.

Side by side

Phi-4 and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Phi-4Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderMicrosoft01.AI
Noometry Index31.230.6
Released2024-12-112024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.07—
Output $ / M tokens$0.14—
Results tracked3721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi-4 leads

Phi-4: 34.4 (#239), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%33.9%
LMArena Coding12311169
BigCodeBench Complete55.4%43.8%
LiveBench Coding30.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi-4: 22.8 (#128), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.8%—
BALROG11.6%—

Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads

Phi-4: 17.7 (#291), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts12201160
Chess Puzzles1%—
LiveBench Reasoning47.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis45.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.42—
LiveBench41.6%—

Math Yi-1.5-34B leads

Phi-4: 20.8 (#285), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math12461182
MATH Level 564.9%25.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202513.8%—
LiveBench Math42%—

Knowledge Phi-4 leads

Phi-4: 32.6 (#209), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond56.1%32%
LMArena Expert12031144
Confabulations29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.7%—
MMLU84.8%—

Multilingual Phi-4 leads

Phi-4: 37.2 (#237), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English11971121
LMArena Chinese12121213
LMArena French12241156
LMArena German12221111
LMArena Japanese11581021
LMArena Korean11511005
LMArena Russian12091091
LMArena Spanish12341121

Instruction Following Phi-4 leads

Phi-4: 60.4 (#251), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following12011139
LiveBench Instruction Following58.4%—

Long Context Phi-4 leads

Phi-4: 36.9 (#226), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query12171143

Writing & Preference Phi-4 leads

Phi-4: 40.5 (#244), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text12171173
LMArena Creative Writing11821135
LMArena Multi-Turn12061153
Short-Story Creative Writing62.6%—
LiveBench Language25.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Phi-4 and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Phi-4 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper