Model comparison
Qwen3 14B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 14B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 18.5.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.5 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-04 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.35 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.40 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 64% | — |
| LMCA | 18.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.23 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 63.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 62.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3 14B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.
Is Qwen3 14B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.3 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3 14B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 14B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.