Model comparison
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 18.2.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.5 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 36.1 (#212), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 33.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 28.1 (#94), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 19.5% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 18.2 (#284), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 52.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 45.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.44 | — |
| LiveBench | 45.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 34.5 (#194), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 59.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 35.7 (#182), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 61.6 (#243), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 49.6 (#188), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 26.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.1 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.