Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.2 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 8.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 39.2% for Magistral Medium and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Magistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.234.3
Released2025-03-172026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$5$0.80
Results tracked223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode39.2%32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%
LMArena Coding1319—

Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt0.3%0%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—

Math Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Math1250—

Knowledge Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1227—
LMArena French1267—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1271—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.2 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper