Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.1 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 25.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 34.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.1 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.