Model comparison
Qwen3.5-9B vs Wizardlm 70b
Qwen3.5-9B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.3 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 35.3 to 30.9.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5-9B leads
Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 9.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5-9B leads
Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| DTBench | 71.2% | — |
| LMCA | 24.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.45 | — |
Math Qwen3.5-9B leads
Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 48.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 61.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5-9B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Qwen3.5-9B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.3 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen3.5-9B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5-9B and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5-9B has 10 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.