Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen Max
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.6 vs 34.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Max in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads 39.0 to 30.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 51.6% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 21.8% for Qwen Max.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | 21.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1288 |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1269 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Qwen Max leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | 1% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Qwen Max leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1248 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1290 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1262 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1277 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Qwen Max?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.6 vs 34.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen Max better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen Max share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.