Model comparison

Qwen Max vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen Max and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.7 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 30.7.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen Max and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Qwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.734.3
Released2024-04-032026-02-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window33K262K
Max output8K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.60$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$6.40$0.80
Results tracked233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
Aider Polyglot21.8%—
SciCode—32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%
LMArena Coding1288—

Reasoning Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1269—

Math Not comparable

Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.1%—
LMArena Math1275—
MATH Level 567.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
LMArena Expert1248—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1263—
LMArena Chinese1254—
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1254—
LMArena Japanese1205—
LMArena Korean1142—
LMArena Russian1274—
LMArena Spanish1290—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1262—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
LMArena Longer Query1288—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1282—
LMArena Creative Writing1248—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Max better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen Max and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.7 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

Is Qwen Max or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper