Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.6 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 40% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 40% | 34.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena German | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.6 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.