Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 33.4.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Codellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index33.749.9
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked737

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1498
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts10521486
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.21

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
ProofBench—39%
LMArena Math—1483

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
LMArena Expert—1478

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English9921472
LMArena Chinese—1518
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1483
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following10241457

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query—1462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text10571479
LMArena Creative Writing—1437
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260
LMArena Multi-Turn—1485

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper